History of Live-Work Developments
With the onset of the industrial revolution and concomitant advances in transportation technology, commuting to work over some distance became the rule rather than the exception. Technology and the intense urbanization gave rise to movement for social improvement and the introduction to zoning. The primary mode of land use regulation, which continues to the present day as the mainstay of modernist city planning: today mixed-use development is the exception rather than the rule and primarily a remnant to earlier times. Commuting is hell – on our time, our money, the environment and our childcare. The introduction of the Internet, fax machines and teleconferencing make travel to face-to-face meetings less necessary. Affordability of a single home and workplace, less transportation money and the elimination of childcare are all advantages. Artists have done this for years, using their homes as working space and living, mainly due to the fact they get the urge to produce at various times of the day. Today Americans aspire to telecommute, to run a small business at home, or to simply enjoy the flexibility, light and space afforded by urban loft living.
Posted in Historical and tagged architecture, automobile, commuting, development, economy, environment, history, live-work, review, suburbs, urban by Studio Render with 21 comments.
Historical Environmental Review – Jacobs’ House I
Project: Jacobs’ House I
Architect: Frank Lloyd Wright
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Client: Herbert and Katherine Jacobs
Year Built: 1936
Historically speaking, in this case pre-1940’s, building took into account many factors that the technology of today has let us overlook. Factors such as building orientation, using local materials and designing to minimize expensive excess, to name a few. Architects specify tile that comes from Italy, steel that must be expensively procured, shipped and attached, and designing HVAC to overcome bad design so that everyone is comfortable. The question is why we have gone away from responsible designing and building techniques; because we are used to taking technology and what we are able to get for granted. Architects like Frank Lloyd Wright were known for using site materials for construction and being “Organic Architecture”. That doesn’t mean they are sustainable structures, but many are very good examples of what could be done easily in today’s society to maintain environmental sensitivity.
An example of one of these structures is the Jacobs House by Frank Lloyd Wright which is dated 1936. The house was commissioned by Herbert and Katherine Jacobs in the hopes that they could get a Wright home at minimal cost. Wright called this design a Usonian house, which stood for United States of North America or “a dwelling “of and for” the United States.” This type of design was based on the promise of an affordable, beautiful home for a Democratic America. These homes were designed in a way that space was not wasted and the spaces were placed to maximize efficiency. The “core” consisted of the kitchen, laundry and utilities, which in turn when grouped together, piping was reduced. Spaces then built off of the core and usually spread out in an “L” configuration. Other notable aspects of these homes were typically a concrete floor slab with gravity heating and sandwich partitions to reduce on cost. With that said, this “economical” home was to be efficient in all manners.
The Jacobs House was specifically and purposely designed to keep costs low while retaining an artistic feel. The following is a breakdown of the successful environmental issues that are addressed by the design.
· This dwelling is broken into a private and public facade. The public face is on the Northern side and only has small clerestory windows as means of fenestration. These windows allow natural light to bleed into the Northern spaces; people gravitate to spaces that have natural light coming from more than one direction. The private face of the home is on the Southern side and maximizes natural light with ample windows and glass doors. This area is covered by a large overhang that in the summertime will shade and resist the summer sun from overheating the spaces while the winter sun amply heats the spaces comfortably.
· Wright achieves a public and private breakdown in the floor plan as well. The public wing, located on the west side, contains the living room, which is about 1/3 of the square footage, as well as the core of the home. Having the living room orientated to the southwest allows the room to become bright and cheery which is the prime location for a space that will be used the majority of the time. The east wing contains the private areas of the bedrooms, study and shop. Sleeping to the east allows the morning sun to make its way into the spaces and becomes pleasant spaces in the morning hours.
· The home has 2 entries off of the East facade and both are sheltered entries which aids in the ability to keep exterior conditions from affecting the interior. One entry actually has a thermal break, 2 sets of doors to entry a main space, which gives a chance for the outdoor conditions to be “trapped” in a space before entering the actual living spaces.
· In an attempt to minimize piping in the home, Wright grouped the bath, kitchen and laundry in a central location.
· The “L-shaped” home has benefits beyond the floor plan. A long narrow structure will allow sunlight to reach father into an interior and therefore making artificial lighting less needed. This shape also allows for more privacy due to the fact that rooms are not clustered together.
· The home was built on a concrete slab that contained gravity heating, which means hot water pipes are run in the floors and by means of gravity the heat rises out of the floor and aids in conditioning the spaces. Since heat rises this is an optimum location to heat.
· The home has an interior fireplace which helps in heating the spaces by means of thermal storage inside the masonry walls. It is located in the largest room, living room, which would be the hardest space to condition.
· The walls, besides the Northern Masonry walls near the entry, are constructed of a sandwich type process. Storrer (1993) “The dry wall uses horizontal recessed 3-inch redwood battens with 9-inch pine boards screwed on to a core of vertical pine boards.”
· It has been said that Wright used bricks on the home that were deemed “substandard” from the Johnson Wax Building in order to lower the costs of the masonry walls.
FLOOR PLAN
When looking at the dwelling as a whole one may not notice those aspects and that is what makes this home such a success. There are ways to design a home so that the owner does not know what makes it work, just as long as it does. That is what creates a market for Architecture and when you do it well, clients come back for more. About ten years after moving into the home the Jacobs asked Wright to design them a new home on account of wanting more space. Wright responded with yet another and more efficient design for them. The question then asks, if Frank Lloyd Wright was able to improve on a good design for the same client back during the depression era, why can’t the designers of today do at least as much as Wright did? The house was made for minimal price but was able to offer so much in good design and environmental responsibility. The technology of today seems to be more of a burden than an advantage; Architects of today must realize these opportunities and get back to good design, instead of building the most decorated box.
CREDITS
Alexander, Christopher. A Pattern Language: Towns Buildings Construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
Great Buildings Online. Retrieved October, 2004. Website
www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Jacobs_House-Madison.html
Wright in Wisconsin. Retrieved October, 2004, from BedZED. Website: www.dgunning.org/architecture/Wisc/jacobsI.htm
Storrer, William Allin. The Frank Llyod Wright Companion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Posted in Frank Lloyd Wright and tagged Discussion, environmental, Frank Lloyd Wright, green, home, jacobs' house, residential, review, Sustainable by Studio Render with 69 comments.
Villa Savoye
Villa Savoye, dubbed as Le Corbusier’s masterpiece was constructed in 1929 in Poissy, France. This structure sits on an open site and gives the feeling that the building is floating. This open site has been said to be the reason for its stature. The site gave Corbusier a chance to apply his 5 points of architecture without the constraints of an urban site. The main section of this residence is a box that sits atop slender pilotis or stilts that are offset from the edge of the structure above. The building which was designed out of concrete and plaster unit masonry shows the purist Modern design of Corbusier. This modern structure designed to be “machine a habiter”, a machine for living, uses a flat roof and strip “ribbon” windows to give this freestanding building a distinct modern look. In addition, the design is simplified with the pure white color and lack of ornamentation as well as the curvilinear forms on both the roof and lower level to further support the machine imagery.
The modern design continues into the interior of Villa Savoye. Corbusier uses non-traditional conveying systems, an open plan, an integral ground floor garage, built-in furniture and a roof garden to give this machine a habitable and efficient feel. The interior flows well from one space to another with the use of ramps and spiral staircases, while creating a modular feel and keeping movement from one space to overlapping spaces available. The use of the “ribbon” windows provides this interior with ample sunlight and giving the framed look to the exterior.
The theory behind this structure is based on a Modernist view and directly affected by World War II. The use of industrial materials associates this residence with the Modern Movement. These facts teamed with Corbusier’s preference to a square plan and pure, natural form come together to express his theory in Villa Savoye.
Posted in Historical and tagged architecture, Discussion, history, review, villa savoye by Studio Render with 3 comments.
